In the mediaeval and early modern periods it was quite common for a landed estate to be granted in entail. For the owner of the entailed estate, this meant that he could look forward to his descendants being masters of the estate for the forseeable future. The problem was that it was difficult to sell any part of the estate, because of the principle of NemoDatQuodNonHabet. That is, the owner of the entail could not give a better title than he himself had, and his title expired on the end of his lineage. This was not appealing for prospective buyers, who were not prepared to take the risk of buying a title that might evaporate without warning. Various complex and rather devious methods were devised to allow entailed estates to be bought and sold, and it eventually became possible for the owner of an entail InPossession to dispose of it as if he were the FeeSimple owner, barring the claims of any Remainderman. This was good for the entail onwer if he wanted to sell, and for property trading in general, but it prevented the entail owner from ensuring that his own descendants did not sell the land out of the family. The solution to this was the process of `successive resettlement'. Assume that the `master' of the estate has a life estate InPossession, and his eldest son an entail InRemainder. When the son came of age his entail was converted (`resettled') to a life estate, and the entail resettled on his own eldest son (the grandson of the owner of the life estate). Then, when the grandson came of age, his entail itself would be converted into a life interest, and a new entail granted. And so on. The object of this exercise was to prevent the entail in remainder ever coming into possession, and thus prevent it being sold away.
Law glossary index
©1994-2006 Kevin Boone, all rights reserved