It is not, in general, a defence for the defendant to claim that his offence resulted from entrapment. Before the passage of the PoliceAndCriminalEvidenceAct1984 judges had no real discretion to penalise the Crown for the use of such procedures. Now under s.78 of that Act a judge may rule evidence obtained by entrapment inadmissible. This will only be effective if it is shown that the introduction of the evidence is prejudicial to the fairness of the trial beyond its probative value. However, the HumanRightsAct1998 gives effect to the `right to a fair trial', and it may be that courts will come under increased pressure to strike out entrapment cases. For a discussion of s.78, see ImproperlyObtainedEvidence.
Law glossary index
©1994-2006 Kevin Boone, all rights reserved