It is not the freedom from rent that technically distinguishes a freehold interest from a lesser form of estate, such as a Tenancy, nor the right to enjoyment in perpetuity (because this was not a feature of, for example, a freehold LifeEstate). One has to ask, then, what real difference existed between, say, the purchase of a life estate and a long Lease established by a fine (see: FinelandAndProperty) The strict distinction seems to be that a lease must be for a specified maximum duration, while the life estate was for life -- an uncertain duration. This relatively small technical distinction made one form of occupation freehold and the other leasehold, subject to entirely different sets of obligations and rights. It is for reasons like this that the 1925 legislation rationalized the nature of freehold and leasehold interests.
Law glossary index
©1994-2006 Kevin Boone, all rights reserved