|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
agreement mistake
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This kind of MistakeInContract occurs where there is no real
`meeting of minds' between the contracting parties, and
the contract is therefore void or voidable. This may arise
because the parties are at cross purposes, or the contract
is too vague to be interpreted. There are
three important types of agreement mistake:
-
mistake as to terms of contract; for example, one party may read the terms of
the offer as implying something different to what is really being offered;
-
mistake as to subject matter; this usually means that the terms are two
imprecise to evidence any meeting of minds;
-
mistake as to person; this is the only common case. Here one of the parties is
mistaken about the identity of the other.
It can be a job for the court to decide whether there really is an agreement
mistake, which may void the contract, or one party has merely made an
error of judgement and the contract is sound.
In mistake as to person, it is common for one party to make a mistake
about the identity of a fraudster. Particular problems arise when
a person buys goods, for example, from a fraudster and then sells
them (innocently) to someone else. In general, in a true mistake
as to identity the contract is void.
ContractLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|