|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Alcock and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1991)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
[1992] 1 AC 310. The claimants were all friends and relatives of victims of
the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. Their claim against the police were
for PsychiatricInjury consequent on the police's negligent crowd control
(see negligence). All their claims failed, for a variety of different
reasons. Alcock is generally regarded as the most authorative statement
of what is required to establish a claim for psychiatric injury, in
circumstances in which personal injury was not reasonably forseeable.
If personal injury was forseeable, then PageVSmith1996 shows that
psychiatric injury is not to be treated differently from any other
type of injury, and the usual rules of negligence apply.
CaseLaw
TortLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|