|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
assistance after the offence
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
Under s.4 of the CriminalLawAct1967 it is
an offence knowingly to carry out any act with intent to
impede the apprehension or prosection of a person known
guilty of a arrestable offence.
Although it is, in general, an offence to attempt to commit
an offence, it is not an offence to attempt to commit out an
offence under this section: the act must actually happen.
Although this offence has similarities with being an
Accomplice to an offence, it is legally distinct, and a
person can be guitly of both aiding and abetting, and
seeking to prevent arrest.
As for an accomplice, a person charged with impeding
apprehension can be found guilty even if the person who
committed the offence is acquitted. However, the statute
does state that assistance must be rendered to the person
who committed the offence, not to a person who is believed
to have committed the offence. This means that in the trial
of the assistant, the principal must be shown to be guilty,
even if he has himself been acquited. As for an
accomplice, the conviction of the principal is evidence
against the assistant, but the acquital of the principal is
not even admissible as evidence. If X believes that Y raped
Z -- when he did not, lacking the MensRea
-- and helps Y to evade prosecution,
he is not guilty of an
offence unless Y can be proven to be guilty in the trial of
X. However, if X assists Y to commit an act that X believes
to be rape, but is not, then he can still be convicted of
being an accomplice to rape.
There are separate offences relating to accepting money
for discouraging a prosecution; they have no specific
names in current legistlation, so are indexed under their
archaic names CompoundingAndMisprision.
CriminalLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|