|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
automatism
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
Acting reflexively, not under conscious control. In English
law the distinction between automatism and Insanity is
drawn on the basis of internal and external factors, and
is somewhat archaic. Automatism requires an external factor
(e.g., a severe head wound). In an archetypal automatism
case, Denning LJ classed sleepwalking as a type of automatism;
more recently it has had to be reclassified as `insanity' because of the
lack of an external factor.
Automatism may be a defence against a criminal charge, but
not if the defendant was responsible for the situation
that gave rise to the automatism (see: RVQuick1973).
In addition, there must be a total loss of
conscious control, not merely an impairment
(see: AGsRef21992).
If the defendant introduces evidence of automatism, the
prosecution have the task of disproving it beyond
reasonable doubt. In insanity, however, the burden of proof
is on the defendant.
CriminalLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|