|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Delaney v TP Smith Ltd (1946)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
[1946] KB 393 (CA). HarperVCharlesworth1825
confirmed that the right to sue for trespass to land was consequent
on being in possession of the land, rather than having an
EstateInLand. In Delaney the claimant, who was
essentially a squatter, sought to rely on this principle to prevent
his eviction by a houseowner (in fact, the claimant had been
given permission to move in, but not in writing). The Court held that
mere possession of land did not give title to sue the person who
owned the freehold interest in trespass.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|