Logo ©1994-2007 Kevin Boone
My professional interests
Computing
Law
Education
Science and research

My leisure interests
Martial arts
Heritage railways
Garden railways
Motorcycles
DIY

Downloads
Linux downloads
Windows downloads
Java downloads
Perl downloads
Home automation downloads

About me
Home & family
My CV

Site info
Contact the author
Download policy
Keyword index

  Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary

Derry v Peek (1888)

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006

(1888) LR 14 App Cas 337 (HL). The defendant tram company advertised in its prospectus that it would employ steam power, and intimated that it had the authority of the Board of Trade to do so. In the end, the Board refused consent to steam power, and the company was wound up. The claimant investor brought an action in the TortOfDeceit, which ultimately failed in the HouseOfLords. While there was no doubt that the defendants' claim was unfounded, the House held that deceit required actual Dishonesty -- Negligence, however culpable was not enough.

Derry v Peek was heard before the development of the modern law of Negligence and, as a result, it became established law that there was no liability in tort for NegligentMisstatement. This largely remained the case until HedleyByrneVHeller1963.

-- Main.KevinBoone - 15 Jan 2004

CaseLaw TortLaw

Law glossary index

   
Search

WebThis site

Shameless plug

By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK

Editorial
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first!

Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese

Computing features
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O

All sorts of Linux stuff

Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here

First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2)