|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Derry v Peek (1888)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
(1888) LR 14 App Cas 337 (HL). The defendant tram company advertised in its prospectus
that it would employ steam power, and intimated that it had the authority
of the Board of Trade to do so. In the end, the Board refused consent to steam
power, and the company was wound up. The claimant investor brought an action
in the TortOfDeceit, which ultimately failed in the HouseOfLords. While
there was no doubt that the defendants' claim was unfounded, the House held that
deceit required actual Dishonesty -- Negligence, however culpable was not
enough.
Derry v Peek was heard before the development of the modern law of
Negligence and, as a result, it became established law that there
was no liability in tort for NegligentMisstatement. This largely
remained the case until HedleyByrneVHeller1963.
-- Main.KevinBoone - 15 Jan 2004
CaseLaw
TortLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|