|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
doctrine of notice
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
To have `notice' of something is to be aware that it
exists. In land and property law the concept of notice
is usually associated with an Encumbrance
on Title. For example, if property X is
held on Trust for beneficiary B, then B's interest is
an encumbrance, and something a purchaser of X
would rather be free of.
The historical position has generally been that
a person who `had notice of' some equitable
interest that encumbered the title of something
he intended to purchase would be bound by
that interest. To show that he had notice, it would be necessary to show
that the purchaser actually knew of the interest
(`actual notice') or that he would have known
of it, had he taken reasonable trouble to find out.
For example, where transfers of land were concerned, it was generally
assumed that a prospective purchaser had notice if he could
have discovered the interest by inspecting the land itself,
or by a reasonably thorough InvestigationOfTitle.
If the purchaser genuinely had no notice of the equitable
interest (see: BonaFidePurchaserWithoutNotice)
then he took the property free of the equitable interests.
The doctrine of notice seemed to be most troublesome where land
transactions were concerned, but it could apply to any kind
of property that could be impressed with a trust (money, shares, etc).
These days it applies only rarely to land transactions.
Where the title to the land is registered,
then by statute it is deemed that the purchaser has notice of
anything entered on the register,
and of nothing else. In UnregisteredConveyancing,
most equitable interests are required to be entered on the
Land Charges Register if they are to be enforceable. The
doctrine of notice does continue to apply where unregistered
land is held on trust.
LandAndPropertyLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|