|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Elliot v C (1983)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case ([1983] 2 All ER 1005) demonstrates how the
definition of Recklessness in RVCaldwell1982
-- which considers whether a risk is `obvious' -- does not
account for the age or mental capacity of the accused.
A 14-year old girl recklessly set fire to a shed and
was charged with arson. Magistrates initially
acquitted her, ruling that the test in Caldwell could
be interpreted as allowing the court to adjust the meaning of
an `obvious' risk to suit the defendent. However, the Divisional
Court reversed this decision, claiming that this was not
what the law said. The later case of RVColes1995
has confirmed this view.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|