Logo ©1994-2007 Kevin Boone
My professional interests
Computing
Law
Education
Science and research

My leisure interests
Martial arts
Heritage railways
Garden railways
Motorcycles
DIY

Downloads
Linux downloads
Windows downloads
Java downloads
Perl downloads
Home automation downloads

About me
Home & family
My CV

Site info
Contact the author
Download policy
Keyword index

  Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary

Evidential burden

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006

A person who wishes to rely on certain facts in a court hearing generally has a duty to adduce sufficient evidence of those facts. This `evidential burden' is also sometimes referred to as an `evidential burden of proof', but this term is misleading. A party to a court hearing that has a BurdenOfProof has a duty not only to adduce evidence of the facts that support its argument, but to prove those facts to the requisite standard (see StandardOfProof). The distinction between an evidential burden and a burden of proof is important in a number of defences to criminal charges, such as SelfDefence. To plead self-defence, the defendant much adduce some admissible evidence that he actually was acting in self-defence, but he does not have the duty of proving it. The prosecution retains a duty to prove that the defendant's assertion of self-defence is ill-founded, and prove it beyond reasonable doubt. For cases where there may be a true burden of proof on the defendant, see ReverseBurdenOfProof.

Whether the evidential burden has been discharged is a question of law, not a question of fact. This means that in a jury trial it is for the judge to determine whether the evidential burden has been satisfied, before the question whether the full burden of proof has been discharged is put to the jury. If the prosecution has not satisfied the evidential burden, the judge may refuse to allow the jury to consider the evidence. If this leaves no evidence for the prosecution, then by definition there is `no case to answer', and the judge may withdraw the case from the jury (see: DirectionToAcquit). Note that the CJA2003 now gives the prosecution a right of appeal against directions to acquit.

CriminalLaw

Law glossary index

   
Search

WebThis site

Shameless plug

By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK

Editorial
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first!

Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese

Computing features
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O

All sorts of Linux stuff

Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here

First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2)