| My professional interests |
|
Computing Law Education Science and research |
| My leisure interests |
|
Martial arts Heritage railways Garden railways Motorcycles DIY |
| Downloads |
|
Linux downloads Windows downloads Java downloads Perl downloads Home automation downloads |
| About me |
|
Home & family My CV |
| Site info |
|
Contact the author Download policy Keyword index |
C-46/93, C-48/93. These cases followed earlier decisions of the ECJ, in which it had been held that member states had been in breach of their obligations under EU law. The question to be determined was whether a specific remedy should be available to the affected individuals. The member states argued that the ECTreaty did not create a general right to reparation for individuals who had suffered loss as a result of member states' breaches of EU law -- such a right could only be creaed by legislation. However, the ECJ held that its duty under Art. 200 was to see that ``the law is observed'', and this meant that it should apply the same principles as were common to the member states in stipulating a remedy.
See StateLiabilityUnderEULaw for discussion.
| Search |
| Shameless plug |
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK |
| Editorial |
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first! Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese |
| Computing features |
|
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O
All sorts of Linux stuff Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2) |