|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Francovitch and Bonifaci v Italy (1991)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
C-6/90, C-9/90. Italy failed to implement into its national law an EC Directive for the
protection of employees in the event of the employer's insolvency. The issue for the
ECJ was whether this failure to act, in itself, created a cause of action in the domestic
courts. It was already established that an unimplemented Directive could have VerticalDirectEffect,
that is, be invoked in a dispute between an individual and the state (e.g.,
VanDuyn1974). However, this case goes a step further, because the ECJ held that, not
only could a directive be invoked in the courts, it could found a cause of action against
the state. In fact, the decision is potentially wider than this, as it describes
any breach of EC law by the state as creating a cause of action, although only
non-implementation is discussed in detail.
The ECJ stated three conditions that had to be satsified for there to be a cause of action
for non-implementation.
The Directive had to create rights for individuals
Those rights had to be ascertainable from the text of the directive
There had to be a causal link between the non-implementation and the claimant's loss
In addition to ruling that an individual could take action against the state for non-implementation,
the ECJ stipulated that the successful litigant should be awarded damages. See RemediesInEULaw
for a discussion of this point; see StateLiabilityUnderEULaw for a discussion of state
liability in general.
CaseLaw
EULaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|