Logo ©1994-2007 Kevin Boone
My professional interests
Computing
Law
Education
Science and research

My leisure interests
Martial arts
Heritage railways
Garden railways
Motorcycles
DIY

Downloads
Linux downloads
Windows downloads
Java downloads
Perl downloads
Home automation downloads

About me
Home & family
My CV

Site info
Contact the author
Download policy
Keyword index

  Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary

Grzlczyk v Centre Public d'Aide Sociale (2001)

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006

C-184/99. The application was a French national studying at a Belgian university. His application for a subsistence award was refused by the Belgian authorities on the basis that he was not a Belgian national. It was not contested that a Belgian citizen in the same circumstances would have been entitled to the award.

Had the applicant been in employment at the time of the application, it is possible he would have succeeded on the basis of rights to education granted by the provisions on FreeMovementOfWorkers (particularly Regulat 1612/68). However, he was not working at the time of the application, and the ECJ approached the case on the basis that he could not be deemed a worker for the purposes of the Regulation.

Until this case was heard, the ECJ had generally been reluctant to rule that the principle of non-discrimination in Art. 12 of the ECTreaty applied to education maintenance awards, although it did apply, for example, to tuition fees (e.g., BrownVSecretaryOfStateForScotland1988, GravierVCityOfLiege1985). However, since the concept of `citizenship' had been created by the TreatyOfMaastricht, a different approach was required.

In Grzlczyk, the ECJ held that since Art. 17 provides that

``Citizens of the Union shall enjoy the rights conferred by this Treaty...''

the principle of non-discrimination was invoked whenever a citizen was exercising a right under the treaty. It was no longer necessary for a claimant to show that his circumstances were such that Art. 12 ought to apply -- any exercise of a right granted by the treaty brought Art. 12 into play.

This meant that, since a Belgian national would have been entitled to a subsistence award, refusing such an award to a French national was in breach of Art. 12.

CaseLaw EULaw

Law glossary index

   
Search

WebThis site

Shameless plug

By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK

Editorial
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first!

Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese

Computing features
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O

All sorts of Linux stuff

Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here

First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2)