| My professional interests |
|
Computing Law Education Science and research |
| My leisure interests |
|
Martial arts Heritage railways Garden railways Motorcycles DIY |
| Downloads |
|
Linux downloads Windows downloads Java downloads Perl downloads Home automation downloads |
| About me |
|
Home & family My CV |
| Site info |
|
Contact the author Download policy Keyword index |
[1997] AC 655 (HL). A resident of London docklands bought an action in nuisance against the developers of the Canary Wharf tower. The nuisances complained of included, among other things, deposits of building dust over the local properties, and intereference with television reception. The HouseOfLords held that dust deposits could amount to a nuisance, if damage was proved, but interference with television was not an interference with resisdents' property rights. The House also suggested, contrary to the CourtOfAppeal's ruling in KhorasandjanVBush1993, that only people with a proprietary interest in land had title to sue in nuisance.
| Search |
| Shameless plug |
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK |
| Editorial |
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first! Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese |
| Computing features |
|
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O
All sorts of Linux stuff Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2) |