|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
implicit assumpsit
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This principle allows a court to incorporate a past
benefit (see: Consideration)
into a new Contract, and thereby deem that the
contract has sufficient consideration
to be enforceable. In general, past benefits are not
consideration (see: ReMcArdle1951).
Assumpsit can only be invoked in the following circumstances:
-
the past benefit must have been at the explicit request of the person against
whom the claim is made, and
-
there must have been an assumption that the benefit will be recompensed in the
future, and
-
all the other requirements for a valid contract must be in place. Assumpsit
can not be applied if the contract would not have been a good one even if the
consideration had been valid.
For example, if A asks B to do some work, and A does, knowing that
some recompense will be offered, then B offers a payment, this
sequence of events constitutes a contract and is enforceable. On the
other hand, if B does the work and then brings it to the attention of
A, who offers payment, this is not enforceable. The latter situation
is a straightforward case of past consideration.
Implicit assumpsit would, therefore, not have helped the
claimants in Re McArdle
because they did the work for which they were claiming at their own behest, not
on the request of the defendant.
ContractLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|