|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
intention to enter into a legally binding agreement
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
A fundamental principle of Contract law is that the contracting
parties must actively intend to enter into an arrangement that creates
legal obligations. For common-sense reasons, domestic arrangements
are assumed not to create a contract, while commercial arrangements
are assumed to create one, unless clearly specified otherwise.
As far as domestic arrangements are concerned, it is clearly
contrary to public policy to have routine domestic disputes
tying up the courts. In Balfour v Balfour Atkins LJ said that
a husband's offer to pay money to his wife was ``outside the realm
of contracts altogether'' (see: BalfourVBalfour1919). Similar
assumptions have been made for other family agreements
(e.g., see: JonesVPadavatton1969,
and even for social organizations.
There are some exceptions to this assumption. For example, agreements
made by divorced or separated couples over the disposition of
property are likely to be considered contracts
(see: MerrittVMerritt1970). In these cases the arrangements are
no longer really domestic. In addition, arrangement that significantly
affect the lives of any party are likely to be taken as contracts
(see: ParkerVClark1960).
For commercial arrangements, the opposite assumption applies.
In commercial dealings it is extremely difficult to evade the
obligations of an agreement by claiming that it was never intended
to be legally binding
(see: EdwardsVSkywaysLtd1964,
EssoVCustomsAndExciseCommissioners1976).
To create this effect, the wording of the agreement must be
very clear (see: RoseAndFrankCoVCrompton1925).
ContractLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|