|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
JSB direction where accused does not testify
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
The Judicial Studies Board issued this specimen jury direction to
be used in cases where the accused declines to testify.
It was approved by the Divisional Court in RVCowanEtc1996.
"The defendant has not given evidence. That is his right. But, as he has been
told, the law is that you may draw such inferences as appear proper from his
failure to do so. Failure to give evidence on its own cannot prove guilt but
depending on the circumstances, you may hold his failure against him when
deciding whether he is guilty. [There is evidence before you on the basis of
which the defendant's advocate invites you not to hold it against the defendant
that he has not given evidence before you namely ... If you think that because
of this evidence you should not hold it against the defendant that he has not
given evidence, do not do so.] But if the evidence he relies on presents no
adequate explanation for his absence from the witness box then you may hold his
failure to give evidence against him. You do not have to do so. What proper
inferences can you draw from the defendant's decision not to give evidence
before you? If you conclude that there is a case for him to answer, you may
think that the defendant would have gone into the witness box to give you an
explanation for or an answer to the case against him. If the only sensible
explanation for his decision not to give evidence is that he has no answer to
the case against him, or none that could have stood up to cross-examination,
then it would be open to you to hold against him his failure to give evidence.
It is for you to decide whether it is fair to do so."
EvidenceLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|