|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Cimrinal Proceedings against Keck and Mithouard (1993)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
C-267/91, C-268/91. The defendants were prosecuted under French law for selling
goods at a loss. Their defence was that French law was incompatible with
Art. 28 of the ECTreaty, as interpreted in the case of CassisDeDijon1979,
as it would have the practical effect of limiting the sale of imported products.
Of course, the law limited equally the sale of domestic products, but it was
clear from Cassis that this, in itself, would not prevent the law falling
foul of Art. 28.
The ECJ sought to clarify the Cassis ruling by claiming that it applied
only to `market access rules', that is, rules made by member states that
regulated the access of products to a particular market. The French
restriction on selling at a loss was a `selling arrangement', and therefore
not within the scope of Cassis.
See AbolitionOfQuantitativeRestrictions for a discussion.
CaseLaw
EULaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|