Logo ©1994-2007 Kevin Boone
My professional interests
Computing
Law
Education
Science and research

My leisure interests
Martial arts
Heritage railways
Garden railways
Motorcycles
DIY

Downloads
Linux downloads
Windows downloads
Java downloads
Perl downloads
Home automation downloads

About me
Home & family
My CV

Site info
Contact the author
Download policy
Keyword index

  Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary

McWilliams v Sir William Arrol __TITLE__ Co (1962)

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006

[1962] 1 WLR 295 (HL). The claimant was the widow of a steel construction worker who had died after falling from a tower he was erecting for the defendant employer. The employer conceded that he was in breach of both common law and statutory duties to provide safety harnesses for employees working at height. However, there was compelling evidence that the deceased would not have worn a safety harness, even had he been provided one. Consequently, although the employer was in breach of a DutyOfCare, the breach was not factually causative of the employee's death.

CaseLaw TortLaw

Law glossary index

   
Search

WebThis site

Shameless plug

By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK

Editorial
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first!

Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese

Computing features
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O

All sorts of Linux stuff

Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here

First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2)