| My professional interests |
|
Computing Law Education Science and research |
| My leisure interests |
|
Martial arts Heritage railways Garden railways Motorcycles DIY |
| Downloads |
|
Linux downloads Windows downloads Java downloads Perl downloads Home automation downloads |
| About me |
|
Home & family My CV |
| Site info |
|
Contact the author Download policy Keyword index |
[1940] 1 KB 4. At common law, a defendant in a criminal trial could only have his bad character exposed by prosecution witnesses if the defendant put his own character in issue (see PuttingCharacterInIssue). In this case it was held that casting imputations on prosecution witnesses did not amount to putting the defendant's character in issue; consequently, provided the defendant does not testify (which would bring the provisions of the CriminalEvidenceAct1898 into play), the defendant can malign any witness he likes in any way, and not have his own bad character exposed.
The Butterwasser ruling will be reversed when the CriminalJusticeAct2003 comes fully into force -- under s.101(1) a defendant becomes subject to evidence of his bad character being adduced whenever he `makes an attack on the character of another person'.
| Search |
| Shameless plug |
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK |
| Editorial |
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first! Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese |
| Computing features |
|
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O
All sorts of Linux stuff Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2) |