|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
R v Caldwell (1982)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case ([1982] AC 382) remains the leading authority on the nature
of Recklessness in offenses such as criminal damage.
Caldwell set fire to a hotel, in which people were staying,
out of a grudge against the proprietor. He claimed intoxication as
a defence to a charge of intention to endanger life; this
defence was upheld, but it was ruled the intoxication was no
defence against a charge of recklessness. The House of Lords
held that although the accused could claim not to have
forseen risk, and therefore was not subject to a charge
of recklessness as set out in RVCunningham1957,
recklessness could reasonably include cases where
a reasonable (i.e., not drunk) person would have seen that the
risk was obvious.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|