|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
R v Coles (1995)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case ([1995] 1 Cr App Rep 157) is a relatively recent
confirmation of the case of ElliotVC1983. In
the earlier case a girl recklessly set fire to a shed and was
charged with arson, despite being only 14 years old.
In this case, Coles set fire to a haystack, again in
an act of recklessness. Despite his being of less than average
intelligence, the Court of Appeal held that the test for
whether a risk was `obvious' was whether it was obvious
to an ordinary person. No allowance was made for the
specific condition of the accused. In
RVReid1992 it had been ruled that a reasonable
person could overlook an obvious risk if, for example,
he was suddenly distracted, but this was not the case here.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|