Logo ©1994-2007 Kevin Boone
My professional interests
Computing
Law
Education
Science and research

My leisure interests
Martial arts
Heritage railways
Garden railways
Motorcycles
DIY

Downloads
Linux downloads
Windows downloads
Java downloads
Perl downloads
Home automation downloads

About me
Home & family
My CV

Site info
Contact the author
Download policy
Keyword index

  Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary

R v Coles (1995)

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006

This case ([1995] 1 Cr App Rep 157) is a relatively recent confirmation of the case of ElliotVC1983. In the earlier case a girl recklessly set fire to a shed and was charged with arson, despite being only 14 years old. In this case, Coles set fire to a haystack, again in an act of recklessness. Despite his being of less than average intelligence, the Court of Appeal held that the test for whether a risk was `obvious' was whether it was obvious to an ordinary person. No allowance was made for the specific condition of the accused. In RVReid1992 it had been ruled that a reasonable person could overlook an obvious risk if, for example, he was suddenly distracted, but this was not the case here.

CaseLaw

Law glossary index

   
Search

WebThis site

Shameless plug

By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK

Editorial
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first!

Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese

Computing features
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O

All sorts of Linux stuff

Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here

First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2)