Logo ©1994-2007 Kevin Boone
My professional interests
Computing
Law
Education
Science and research

My leisure interests
Martial arts
Heritage railways
Garden railways
Motorcycles
DIY

Downloads
Linux downloads
Windows downloads
Java downloads
Perl downloads
Home automation downloads

About me
Home & family
My CV

Site info
Contact the author
Download policy
Keyword index

  Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary

R v Fagan (1969)

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006

This case ([1969] 1 QB 439) demonstrates that although an Assault cannot be commited by omission, it may be possible to construe the ActusReus of assault in such a way that a technicality cannot be used to clear the accused in cases of clear wrongdoing. In this case, the accused intentionally stopped his car on a policeman's foot and refused to move it. In his defence he argued that although he had the mens reus (intention) and did the actus reus (stopping the car), they were not coincidental. Refusing to move the car was not, he argued, an assault in itself. The court was not convinced by this argument. Instead it construed the actus reus as a sequence of events beginning when the car stopped and finishing when it was moved off. During the latter part of this continuous action, the accused had the mens rea. Accordingly he was convicted of assaulting a police officer in the course of his duty (s.51(1) of the PoliceAct1964).

CaseLaw

Law glossary index

   
Search

WebThis site

Shameless plug

By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK

Editorial
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first!

Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese

Computing features
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O

All sorts of Linux stuff

Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here

First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2)