Logo ©1994-2007 Kevin Boone
My professional interests
Computing
Law
Education
Science and research

My leisure interests
Martial arts
Heritage railways
Garden railways
Motorcycles
DIY

Downloads
Linux downloads
Windows downloads
Java downloads
Perl downloads
Home automation downloads

About me
Home & family
My CV

Site info
Contact the author
Download policy
Keyword index

  Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary

R v Goldberg (1988)

Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006

(1988) 88 Cr App R 285 (CA). The defendant sought to have his confession excluded under s.76(2)(b) of PACE, on the grounds that it was elicited in circumstances which rendered it unreliable. He was a heroin addict in withdrawal and, he claimed, only confessed because he needed to get away to get another dose. However, the Court of Appeal held that ``anything said or done'' in s.76(2)(b) meant ``anything said or done by the police to the suspect''. It did not apply to unfavourable circumstance which the suspect had brought on himself.

It is not entirely straightforward to reconcile this case with RVMcGovern1990, where the defendant's confession was excluded because it was made unreliable by her pregnancy and vomiting. McGovern's preganancy was no more something `said or done' by the police than Goldberg's heroin addiction.

CaseLaw EvidenceLaw

Law glossary index

   
Search

WebThis site

Shameless plug

By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK

Editorial
So you want to be a university lecturer? Read this first!

Speak like your boss: new developments in managerese

Computing features
File handling in the Linux kernel: an in-depth look at how Linux handles files, filesystems, and file I/O

All sorts of Linux stuff

Confused about CLASSPATH? answers are here

First steps in EJB using jBoss (recently revised for jBoss 3.2)