|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
R v Ireland and Burstow (1998)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case ([1998] AC 147, House of Lords) demonstrates
that silence can be considered the actus reus of
an assult, as well as words and actions. This report concerns
two similar cases in which the defendants made intimidatory
phone calls to women; in both cases when the women answered
the telephone they remained silent. In the case of Burstow
there were other forms of harrassment as well. Accordingly
Ireland was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily
harm (s.47 of the OffencesAgainstThePersonAct1861)
and Burstow of maliciously causing grievious bodily harm
(s.20 of the same Act). Assault is conventionally defined as behaviour
that puts the victim in immediate apprehension of harm. In this
case the immediacy is questionable.The case also raised the problem
of whether psychiatric effects could constitute bodily
harm. In the 1861 Act it did not appear to be the case, but
the House of Lords held that the Act should be interpreted
in the light of modern scientific theories of psychiatric
illness. At least part of the reason for extending the
notitions of assault and bodily harm as in this case was to
allow telephone harrassment to be properly prosecuted; this
public policy issue was alluded to in the judgement.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|