|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
R v Moloney (1985)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case ([1985] 2 WLR 648) introduced a new
definition of Intention in murder charges, largely
overruling the earlier decision in HyamVDPP1974.
Mr Moloney got into an argument with his stepfather about
who could load and fire a shotgun quickest. In the argument
the stepfather was shot dead and therefore Moloney was
charged with murder. At the trial the judge directed the
jury following the principle established in hyam,
that `intention' may be defined as an express desire and
purpose to do something, but need not be. Instead, he explained,
it was reasonable to assume intention if the consequences are
highly probable on the basis of the action carried out. On
these grounds Moloney was convicted; it was not necessarily
the case that Moloney set out to kill his stepfather, but
it was a probable consequence of his actions.
The Court of Appeal supported this decision, but the
House of Lords converted it to manslaughter. In so doing
a new meaning of `intention' was introduced. Lord Bridge
said that intention may be inferred from the common-sense
meaning of the term (that the accused has the express
purpose of committing some crime, and acts to do so).
However, if the results are the `natural consequences'
of the accused's actions, this supports a belief
that intention was present. It was also made clear that,
in general, the existence of `intention' could be left
for a jury to decide.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|