|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
R v Stone and Dobinson (1977)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case (Stone and Dobinson [1977] QB 354 Court of Appeal)
demonsrates how a duty of care may be assumed, even
where there is no formal duty.
Stone's sister lived with Stone and Dobinson. The sister was
anorexic, and although ill she refused to leave her room to seek medical attention.
Stone and Dobinson made some effort to care for the sick woman, but did
not call the medical services. Eventually she died. Stone and Dobinson
were convicted of manslaughter. The essence of their appeal was that,
first, they had no legal duty of care to the sick woman and, second,
there prosecution could not demonstrate that `recklessness' necessary
to support a conviction of manslaughter.
The Appeal Court ruled that on the first point the accused had assumed
a duty of care, by allowing the sick woman to live in their home and
making no other arrangements for her. On the second, the court ruled
that `indifference to an obvious risk' did constitute recklessness.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|