|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
R v Venna (1975)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case ([1975] 3 All ER 788) demonstrates that Recklessness is
sufficient mens rea for an assault, as well
as specific Intention. Venna was arrested along with some
friends for a public order offence. He stuggled violently
with the arresting officer and, as a result, fractured a bone in
the officer's hand. In defence he claimed that he lacked the
specific intention to be charged with an offence under
s.47 of the OffencesAgainstThePersonAct1861. However,
the Court of Appeal held that this kind of recklessness would
confer liability.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|