|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
R v Woolin (1997)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case ([1997] 4 All ER 103) is (at the time of writing) the
most recent considered by the House of Lords on the vexed
question of what consitutes Intention in murder.
Mr Woolin killed his baby son in a fit of anger, by throwing
him on a hard surface. The trial judge -- as often happens
in these cases -- took a broad view of intention, directing
the jury that they could infer that Woolin intended to
kill his son if there was a `substantial risk' of
serious injury. Accordingly he was convicted of
murder. The Court of Appeal upheld this conviction,
arguing that the principle of RVNeddrick1986
was too restrictive, and that the jury should be able
to infer intention from all the facts of the case.
The House of Lords, however, converted the conviction
to manslaughter, upholding the Neddrick
principle.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|