|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Re McArdle (1951)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:37 2006
This case (Re McCardle [1951] Ch 669) is the archetypal example
of a past benefit being unacceptable as Consideration in
a Contract.
The occupants of a house carried out certain
improvements during their tenancy, and were offered payment in
recompense by the owner. However, the owner died before doing so,
and his representatives refused to honour the promise. The
courts supported the owner's representatives, because the tenants
had not provided good consideration.
Note that in this case the tenants' work was carried out at their
own behest, and not at the request of the owner. Had the owner
explicitly requested the tenants to do the work, and then
offered payment, the court may have been able to use the
doctrine of ImplicitAssumpsit to incorporate the past
work into the agreement, and thereby deem it consideration.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|