|
©1994-2007 Kevin Boone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
stop and search
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:38 2006
This article describes the general powers that the police have
to search people and vehicles; powers to search premises
are dealt with elsewhere. It also discusses the regulations
that govern the exercise of stop and search powers.
Stop and search: overviewThe public are (rightly) worried that the increasing powers of the police to stop and search are an infringement of civil liberties. Of particular concern is recent legislation (e.g., the TerrorismAct2000 that allows a search to be lawful when the constable has no grounds to be suspicious of the person searched. An opposing view is that such powers are necessary to uphold the rule of law in a society that has become increasingly aggressive.
In general, any constable may require a person or vehicle stop and be searched, if the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the person has possession of certain illegal items, or the proceeds of crime. In designated areas where, for example, there is a high risk of violence or public disorder, or for the prevention of terrorism, any person or vehicle may be stopped, without such justification. Approval for such actions must have been given in advance. There are also powers to set up `road checks' to search for offenders and escaped prisoners (which requires advance approval), and to prevent breaches of the peace (which does not).
The following table summarises the main provisions that allow the police to stop and search; each will be described separately later.
Stop and search for prevention and detection of crimeThe powers conferred by s.1 of PACE (1984) are mostly intended to assist in the detection and prevention of certain crimes, in particular crimes associated with theft and with offenses against the person. Theft offences include, in addition to theft itself, Burglary, taking a conveyance, and obtaining property by deception. The Act empowers any constable to search a person or vehicle where he has reasonable grounds for believing that any person possesses the proceeds of theft, or articles to be used for theft, or an offensive weapon or other dangerous object. The Act does define an `offensive weapon' -- it is anything `made or adapted for causing injury' -- but does not limit the search to offensive weapons defined in this way. For example, the power also extends to searches for `bladed objects' that can be used to commit an offence under s.139 of the CriminalJusticeAct1988, which may not ordinarily be classed as offensive weapons (e.g., pen-knives).
In general, `vehicle' is defined broadly, and includes boats and aircraft, and there are few places where the power to stop and search cannot be exercised. The notable exceptions are that there is no power to search inside a dwelling, or to search the legal occupier of a dwelling in the attached grounds. However, there is a power to search a person in a yard or garden attached to a dwelling if there is a suspicion that the person has no lawful right to be there.
Although s.1 of PACE gives powers to stop and search most people in most places most of the time, the public are protected by the need for the constable to demonstrate `reasonable suspicion' that one of the objects covered by the Act will be found. Otherwise the search will be unlawful, and the constable liable to disciplinary procedures. So what is `reasonable suspicion'?
It goes without saying that ethic origin, colour, religion and class are never going to confer reasonable suspicion for the purposes of PACE. The constable must have good grounds for believing that the search will reveal something covered by the Act, perhaps because of information supplied by a credible memeber of the public or because a person is acting furtively in a area that has been associated with high levels of burglary. There are, clearly, borderline cases. Butterworths (p34), for example, gives as an example the common practice of searching coaches containing football supporters on the way to matches. Merely being a football supporter probably does not confer the reasonable grounds for suspicion required by PACE. However, such searches frequently do reveal articles that could be classed as offensive weapons. Moreover, it is accepted that certain groups or gangs are regularly involved in criminal activity, and therefore people displaying the insignia of such groups are under more like to to be subjects of reasonable suspicion than other people. On balance, football supporters as a group probably do not qualify as a `group or gang' for these purposes, so routinely searching them is on the boundary of lawful procedure.
As well as requiring reasonable suspicion, the conduct of the search must be according to Code of Practice `A' of PACE (1984), as discussed below.
Stop and search for prevention of violenceIn contrast to the provision of s.1 of PACE (1984), s.60 of the CriminalJusticeAndPublicOrderAct1994 provides for stop and search without `reasonable suspicion'. Under these terms a constable can lawfully require anyone to submit to search.
The Act is not intended to create a police state, but to reduce the ability for criminals to use peaceful demonstrations and festivals as an excuse for rioting and violence. The provisions of the Act therefore apply only for short periods of time, in designated locations. Any police officer or the rank of Inspector or higher can authorize the application of these powers for 24 hours. A further 24 hours can be authorizied by a superintendent. Once the provisions of the Act have been invoked, a constable need not show reasonable suspicion to conduct a search; however, the authorizing officer must have reasonable grounds for thinking that their use is justified. Such grounds may include a belief that violence demonstrations are being planned, or that people are carrying offensive weapons. For these purposes, `offensive weapon' has the same meaning as in PACE, and may included bladed object not normally considered offensive.
A person stopped under these powers can be searched for dangerous articles; any found may be seized. In addition, the police have the power to compel people to remove any outer clothing that they believe is being worn to conceal identity.
Stop and search for prevention of hooliganismThe SportingEventsControlOfAlchoholEtcAct1985 is intended primarily to control football hooliganism. It makes it an offence to supply alchoholic beverages on a vehicle intended to transport football supporters to matches. To search a vehicle the police must have reasonable suspicion that its occupants have been supplied with alchohol, or are drunk, not (in theory) that it is carrying football supporters. Reasonable suspicion may result from, for example, information supplied by a member of the public.
Conduct of stop and search proceduresCode of Practice `A' of PACE (1984) governs most stop and search activities; in cases where it does not this is usually because it is not relevant, rather than because draconian powers are to be wielded without restraint. For a defence lawyer or defendant, it is important to understand that a search that contravenes Code A, although unlawful, does not necessarily render evidence obtained inadmissible.
The Code sets out the following procedure to be followed when exercising stop and search powers.
Force or compulsion may be used to secure a search, provided that it has been established that the suspect will not comply willingly.
The Code allows that a person or vehicle may be detained in order for a search to be carried out. It expressly forbids the detention of a person or vehicle to find grounds for a further search.
The suspect is not required to offer his name or address, except in cases where this would normally be required. That is, the power to stop and search does not extend to compelling a person to reveal his identity. It is illegal to detain a person for the purposes of identifying him. Of course, the power of arrest may be invoked if the constable has grounds for believing that the suspect is guilty of a serious offence and does not provide a credible name or address. PACE indicates that the search record should include a description where the suspect refuses to identify himself.
Stop and search `Road checks'The term `road check' usually refers to the construction of a checkpoint at which vehicles are stopped to be inspected. There are two legal authorities for this: section 4 of PACE, and common-law powers in respect of breach of the peace.
PACE allows an officer of the rank of superintendent or above to authorize road checks for 7 days, which can be extended a further 7 days in exceptional circumstances. To authorize a check under these powers, the officer must have reasonable grounds to believe that vehicle in a designated area is carrying:
Common-law powers allow any constable to stop and search any vehicle where there are reasonable grounds for believing that its occupants intend to commit a breach of the peace.
Voluntary searchIf there is no general power to search, a police officer may search a person who consents, provided that
In general, Code A discourages the involvement of the police in routine volutary searches. For example, the managers of sports facilities or public buildings may make it a condition of entry that visitors submit to a search; this is not felt to be a police matter, and is expressly excluded from the Code.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||