|
|
|
Home > Law > Law glossary > Law glossary
Wilkinson v Downton (1897)
Last modified: Thu Feb 23 16:37:38 2006
[1897] 2 QB 57 (QB). With a view to giving her a nasty fright, the
defendant told the claimant that the claimant's husband had met with
a serious accident. The claimant was very distressed, to the point
that she suffered a nervous breakdown and was incapacitated for
several weeks. In an action in tort, it was held that the claim
should succeed, despite not falling within the boundaries of
TrespassToThePerson (which required a direct infliction of
harm) or an ActionOnTheCase
(as it then was; now negligence). It would have been an injustice
to allow a wrongful act of this sort to go uncompensated. Since
1897 the law of negligence has expanded considerably, and possibly
an action in negligence would be available in a case like this.
CaseLaw
Law glossary index
|
|
|
|
Shameless plug
|
 By the author of this site. Buy on-line from Amazon USA | UK
|
|