©1994-2003 Kevin Boone
Home     Section index     K-Zone home
A OO-scale model railway

Site search

Modelling
- Latest photos from our garden railway

More...

Real trains
- How does a steam loco actually work? Find out in steam loco 101

Heritage railway reviews for parents

More...

The K-Zone
K-Zone computing

K-Zone law

K-Zone education and science

K-Zone motorcycles

K-Zone DIY

K-Zone railways

K-Zone martial arts

About the author

K-Zone home page

 
Our model railway projects
Railways
Hints on buying
Planning and laying track
Scenery and terrain
Buildings and structures
Model railway control and power equipment
Digital Command Control equipment
Constructing the base

Overview

To build a decent-sized layout you'll need some kind of flat surface to run your trains on. Of course, it may not be flat when you've applied the landscape (see later), but it needs to start off flat. Real trains don't take kindly to gradients, hence the prevalence of cuttings and embankments to keep the rails level while the scenery goes up and down. A model railway can have smooth gradients, and you can get away with a steepness that would be quite out of the question in a real railway, but erratic bumps in the surface will be troublesome, especially near points.
       So, you need a smooth, level surface. The way you obtain it will depend on the layout area. For an area 4' x 8' or smaller, a single piece of plywood reinforced with battens will do fine. Anything much bigger than this will need a more elaborate structure. Our layout uses a latice of 1.5" x 1.5" battens to support the surface. These are supported off the floor by legs of the same material. Three sides of the layout are supported also by battens screwed directly to the wall. If you need to get access to the layout from all sides, then you'll need more legs. Alternatively, use bigger battens. With 1.5" x 1.5" battens, you won't be able to get away with having only one leg at each corner: the whole structure will sag under its own weight.
       Don't forget that if your layout is built right up to two or more walls, you may need to provide an opening to allow access to the areas near the walls. In general, you can probably work on an area at most two feet from where you're standing; perhaps four feet if you really stretch. So ideally, no part of the layout should be more than three feet, ideally two feet, from a place you can stand. For a large layout this may mean that you need to leave an aisle or a hole in the middle. A hole is more traditional, and consumes less layout surface, but it does mean you need to get on your hands and kness to get into it. I have allowed a hole in the middle about 2' square; this will be covered with a removeable scenery panel when not in use.
       For the layout surface itself, there are many alternatives. The traditional approach is to use 3/4" plywood panels. A cheaper alternative is chipboard, of about the same thickness. In both cases you'll need to surface it with something, rather than laying the track directly onto the wood. This is because the trains will clatter horribly if running on such a hard, rigid surface. You can either line the whole layout surface, or lay the rails onto a foam `ballast'. The advantage of the latter is that it looks very realistic: real trains do run on a raised trackbed. The disadvantage is that it's horrible to fit, especially under points. You can get point-shaped foam inserts to match the ballast, but they're very expensive. My preference was to line the entire surface. I experimented with various materials; my first choice was cork. This is very springy and absorbs vibrations very well. On a small, test layout it performed admirably. The problem is cost: to cover a large layout with cork will cost essentially the same as tiling a floor with cork. Moreover, it doesn't take paint very well and its natural colour is not very railway-like. If you want to use cork, you can get it in rolls or tiles; rolls are best for large areas.

Design choices

For the full-sized layout I am using fibreboard floor underlay, because I had a heap of it left over from reflooring other parts of the house. This stuff is intended to be used underneath hardwood floors, to even the surface and provide some springiness. The boards are about 10mm thick, and available in various sizes starting from about 2' x 3'. The advantages of fibreboard include the following.
  • It's cheap compared to the alternatives (about £1 per square meter) and widely available from DIY retailers (I got mine from Wickes);
  • Because it is designed to by springy, it absorbs clattering noises quite well, so trains run very quietly.
  • The boards I used are green, so it won't matter so much if bits of it show through the scenery. It has two different surfaces: one perfectly smooth and the other slightly stippled. The stippled side looks rather like rough grassland, so I laid it with that side up.
  • It can be cut to shape with a sharp knife, which is handy if you have irregularly shaped areas as I do. Cutting leaves a ragged edge which can easily be tidied up with sandpaper.
  • Because the fibreboard is easy to cut, it can be cut into irregular shapes between the tracks. This allows us to represent land that lies below the level of the track. How far down you can go depends on what is below your fibreboard. If it is mounted on a wooden sub-base, you can only go down the depth of the fibreboard. Nonetheless, this gives you the scope to model a pool or small lake whose surface is slightly below the ground level. You could even fill it with water, if the cut-out were waterproofed.
There are a few problems, however.
  • Fibreboard doesn't hold onto track pins as well as wood does, so you'll need to use more pins when laying out the track.
  • Fibreboard isn't quite strong enough to be used as the baseboard itself, but two sheets glued together are (just). Provided you brace the underside regularly enough, it will take a reasonably weight without sagging. It will never be strong enough to stand on, even for a child. The underside can be braced with any old offcuts of timber; I had cartloads of these, left over from other DIY projects. If I had to buy everything from scratch, perhaps a better approach might be fibreboard layed over chipboard. This will be solid and cheap.
  • The fibres are slighly irritating if they settle on the skin. This is only a problem when cutting and sanding.
In any event, our layout surface and structure cost a total of about £30: £20 for the timber and £10 for the fibreboard. This price doesn't include the offcuts that I used for bracing the underside of the layout. You could do it even more cheaply by using unfinished timber; I used planed wood because getting wood splinters in your skin hurts, and the layout is high enough for small children to play underneath it.

Construction

We started by establishing the boundaries of the area to be occupied, and clearing and preparing a space. The picture below shows the working area, which is a corner of the loft.

We then built up the base and the supporting trellis from left to right, supporting it during assembly using sawhorses. The main structural support is provided by battens screwed directly to the walls; the legs provide additional support at approximately 3-foot intervals. The fibreboard panels are not strong enough to be used as the base on their own, so they are braced underneath using off-cuts of wood.

When the supporting framework is in place, the first layer of fibreboard is glued and screwed to the frame, then a second layer of fibreboard glued on top of that. The result is a perfectly flat, smooth surface with a small amount of flexibility and good sound-absorbing properties.